Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÔõäâöääûàÍðãç¯âúÀ» ××éÄÇÑ ïáßÈà÷ìÑÀÇ äÉù»àÍ¿¡ μÇÑ Û¯ÞÒàÊùÊîÜ æÚϼ

A ROENTGEMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF NORMAL SUBMANDIBULAR GLANDS USING ISOBARIC SIALOGRAPHY

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1983³â 13±Ç 1È£ p.127 ~ 137
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¿À±Ô¸í(çïÐ¥Ù¥)/Gyu Myeong O ÀÌ»ó³»(×ÝßÔÒ­)/Sang Rae Lee

Abstract

îÊíº´Â öääûð·¿¡ ÓßÇÑ Ü»æ¸ÀÌ ¾ø°í, îïãóßÒ÷¾°¡ ÕÞû¿ÇÑ ïáßÈà÷ìÑ 37Ù£À» ÓßßÚÀ¸·Î Ôõ öä
äûàÍðãç¯âúÀ» ã¿ú¼ÇÏ¿© ¾òÀº äÉù»àÍðãç¯ÞÐòØ 132ØÝ¿¡¼­ ïáßÈäÉù»àÍÀÇ Óôη ¹× àÍãùòõÀÇ ú°
ÜøùÊîÜ û¡÷¾¿Í ñ²êÌðÚòÄ°úÀÇ Î¼Ìõ¸¦ ϼ٥ÇÏ°íÀÚ Üâ æÚϼ¸¦ ãËê­ÇÑ ¹Ù ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº Ì¿ÒÕÀ»
¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. äÉù»àÍ ÛÉàÜηÀÇ òÁÌÜÀº êÀãýÝ»¿¡¼­ øÁг 1.96§®À̾ú°í, êëڦݻ¿¡¼­´Â øÁг 2.71§®·Î êÀ
ãýÝ»ÀÇ òÁÌèÀÌ ÀÛ¾Ò´Ù.
2 äÉù»àÍ ÛÉàÜηÀÇ ±æÀÌ´Â øÁÓß 42.02§®À̾ú´Ù.
3. äÉù»àÍ ÛÉàÜηÀÌ ù»äÉù»æÞ°ú ÀÌ·ç´Â ÊÇÓø´Â øÁг 35.67ÓøÀ̾ú°í, äÉàßÍéÐÉÀÇ ý­Û°ÌÑÍ£
Ý»¿¡¼­ ÛÉàÜη¿¡ ëîÇÏ¿© ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö´Â ÊÇÓø´Â øÁг 103.05ÓøÀ̾ú´Ù.
4. ê¤ÝÕàÍ ÛÉàÜηÀÇ û¡÷¾¿¡ µû¸¥ ÝÂøÖ´Â ÍØàÊúþÀÌ 39.39%, òÁàÊúþÀÌ 16.67%, SéÔúþÀÌ
22.73%, Ví®úþÀÌ 21.21%À̾úÀ¸¸ç, ÛÉàÜηÀÇ ñËú¼ ßÒ÷¾¿¡ µû¸¥ ÝÂøÖ´Â øÁüÁúþÀÌ 83.33% ÀÌ
¾ú°í, ÞïúþÀÌ 16.67%À̾ú´Ù.
5. äÉù»àÍ ãùòõÀÇ Å©±â´Â ß¾ù»ÊàÀÇ øÁгòÁÌÓÀÌ 45.49§®, îñý­ÊàÀÇ øÁгòÁÌÓÀÌ 43.56§®, Ò®
èâö°ÊàÀÇ øÁгòÁÌÓÀÌ 28.85§®À̾úÀ¸¸ç, ù»äÉéêÊÇÝ»â©ñÞ¿¡¼­ÀÇ ù»Û°æÅíþÀº ±× øÁгËå×î°¡ Ñé
33.65§®À̾ú´Ù.
6 äÉù»àÍ ãùòõÀÇ Öèøà°¡ Àß ÎºóÌµÈ çÓ´Â 77.28%À̾ú°í, Ú°á¬Óôη±îÁö Ù¥ÖüÇÏ°Ô ÎºóÌµÈ çÓ
´Â 50.06%À̾ú´Ù.
7 äÉù»àÍÀÇ Óôη ¹× àÍãùòõÀÇ Å©±â¿Í û¡÷¾¿¡ À־ÀÇ ñ§éÓó¬×ä´Â ìãïÒµÇÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ËÁ
ìÑó¬´Â ä¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The aim of this study was to establish the diagnostic criteria of normal
submandibular glands in adults.
Materials included 132 sialograms of selected person from 23 to 28 years outage.
In subjects each variable was measured and evaluated statistically introducing 18
items respectively.
Conclusions from this study were as follows.
1. The mean diameter of main duct was 1.96mm in distal end and 2.71mm in hilar
end, so the diameter of distal end was smaller than that of hilar end in submandibular
glands.
2. The mean length of main duct was 42.02§® in submandibular glands.
3. The mean angle of main duct was 35.67 degrees with inferior border of mandible
and 103.05 degrees at posterior mylohyoid portion.
4. In configurations following shape of main duct, those revealed that 39.39% of cases
of the curvilinear type, 16.67% of cases of the linear type, 22.73% of cases of the
sigmiod type and 21.21% of cases of the angular type. And in configurations following
course of main duct, those revealed that 83.33% of cases of the smooth type and 16.67%
of cases of the tortuous type.
5. The mean caliber of submandibular glands was 45.59mm in superoinferior height,
43.56§® In anteroposterior width, 28.85§® in mediolateral width and 33.65§® in extent
below mandibular angle.
6. Well-delineated acinar parenchyme was observed in 77.28% of cases and
well-defined tertiary ducts In 50.06% of cases.
7. There were no differences between right and left submandibular glands in size and
shape of main duct and parenchymal portion , but there were great variations in each
individual.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸